Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer: Is Surgery Always Necessary After a Complete Response?

Authors

Keywords:

esophageal cancer; neoadjuvant therapy; complete pathological response; esophagectomy; surveillance

Abstract

Introduction: In resectable esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy is the standard of care, as it has been shown to improve survival compared to surgery alone. The increase in complete responses following chemoradiotherapy raises the possibility of deferring surgery in selected patients.

Objective: To analyze the available evidence on neoadjuvant therapy in resectable esophageal cancer, its complete response rates, and the implications of follow-up via active surveillance versus esophagectomy, with an evaluation of benefits and risks.

Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted through September 2025, including clinical trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and guidelines on chemoradiotherapy, complete response, surveillance, and deferred surgery. Findings from recent multicenter studies and recommendations from international societies were also incorporated.

Results: Consolidated evidence from randomized clinical trials of chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer followed by surgery and long-term follow-up confirms that the combination of chemoradiotherapy and surgery improves overall survival and the rate of complete resections. Between 20% and 40% of patients achieve a pathological complete response, which is associated with a better prognosis. Diagnostic techniques to confirm complete response have limitations, and the risk of occult recurrence persists. Recent studies, including trials of surgery as needed for esophageal cancer, suggest that active surveillance may offer comparable survival in selected patients, provided that intensive follow-up is ensured.

Conclusions: Chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy remains the standard of care. Surveillance after complete response is a promising but still experimental option that should be reserved for research protocols or for high-risk patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Eyck BM, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof CCM, van der Wilk BJ, Shapiro J, van Hagen P, et al. Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(18):1995-2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03614

2. Lin JP, Zhuang FN, Chen WJ, Lin Z, Chen YJ, Chen XF, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with borderline resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2025;23:922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06672-3

3. Bondzi A, Williams K, Velotta J, Banks K, Lee J, Lee J, et al. Patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;168(3):1023-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.03.364

4. Van Hagen P, Hulshof M, van Lanschot JJB, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, et al Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal or Junctional Cancer N Engl J Med 2012;366:2074-84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1112088

5. Eyck BM, van der Wilk BJ, Künzli HT, Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, van Hagen P, et al. Active surveillance versus immediate surgery in clinically complete responders after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Lancet Gast Hep. 2025;10(1):45-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253 (24)30316-8

6. Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J, Zander T, Van Cutsem E, Piessen G, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(13):1191-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032125

7. van der Wilk BJ, Eyck BM, Wijnhoven BP, Jansen W, van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus active surveillance for oesophageal cancer (SANO-trial): a multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2025;26(1):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)30712-2

8. Sun J, Sun C, Zhang Y, Jin Z, Witharana T, Li J, et al Does pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy associate with long-term survival in esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Surgery. 2025;25:295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03016-2

9. Wang P, Chen Y, Wang F, Chen M, Zheng B, Zhang D, et al. Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vesus chemoradiotheray as neoadjuvant therapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: phase 2 randomized trial. Clinical trial. 2025. 3;16(1):9676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64660-z

10. Liu Z, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liu Y, Li Y. ctDNA detects residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and guides adjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Rep Med. 2025;6(4):100407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.100407

11. Williams KM, Banks KC, Velotta JB. Novel neoadjuvant immunotherapy treatment and surveillance strategies in resectable esophageal cancer: innovation leads to improved outcomes. J Thorac Dis. 2025;17(4):1802-06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-1867

12. Goodman KA, Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannová R, Arnold D. Top advances of the year: Gastroesophageal cancer. Cancer. 2024;130(1):1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35309

Published

2026-04-08

How to Cite

1.
Pérez Garcia K, Pérez Palenzuela J, Sosa Martín JG. Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer: Is Surgery Always Necessary After a Complete Response?. Rev. Cub. Cir. [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 8 [cited 2026 Apr. 18];65. Available from: https://revcirugia.sld.cu/index.php/cir/article/view/1799

Issue

Section

Artículos de revisión